By: Orange County Business Lawyer Gregory G. Brown

A corporate distribution to its shareholders (or “dividend”) is the transfer of cash or property from a corporation to its shareholders, without consideration, by virtue of the fact that the shareholders own shares in the corporation. Corp. Code § 166.

Distributions are Discretionary

The most important rule underlying corporate distributions to its shareholders is that the distributions are discretionaryZellerbach v. Allenberg, 99 Cal. 57 (1893).  This means that the directors of a corporation have exclusive authority to declare distributions. Gibbons v. Mahon, 136 U.S. 549, 558 (1890). Corporate directors have the ultimate say on when and how such distributions are made.

Potential Corporate Liability for Improper Distributions

Corporations, however, cannot simply make whatever distribution they see fit.  Instead, a corporation may not even be able to legally make a distribution unless their retained earnings or remaining assets meet certain standards.  Corp. Code § 500.  Additionally, if a corporation’s dividend would make it insolvent, the distribution cannot be legally made. Corp. Code § 501. Corporate directors that make such improper distributions can be held personally liable for their actions.

Pre-Declaration = No Vested Right!

If a corporation is financially sound enough to make a distribution, the directors still do not have to declare a dividend.  There may be other reasons to keep certain cash holdings within the corporation.  In fact, a shareholder has no vested right to a dividend until it is declared by the corporation’s board of directors.  Miller v. McColgan, 17 Cal.2d 432, 436 (1941).  In absence of a declaration of dividends by a corporation’s board of directors, shareholders have no direct proprietary interest in corporate earnings, there being no dividend in earnings until one is declared. Gibbons v. Mahon, 136 U.S. 549, 558, 568 (1890). Put simply, there are no requirements for when a corporation must issue a shareholder distribution.

After Dividend is Declared = Vested Right!

Once a corporation passes a resolution declaring a dividend, though, a corporate shareholder has a right to receive their proportionate share of the corporate distribution.  At this point, the right to receive a dividend has “vested” with the shareholder, and a failure to distribute the declared dividend can form the basis for a lawsuit.

Conclusion

Whether you are a shareholder of a closely-held corporation or own stock in a Fortune 500 company, it is important to know your basic rights to corporate dividends. Please keep these basic rules in mind if a dispute arises as to a party’s right to corporate dividends.

Orange County Business Litigation Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP

Irvine Business Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP

http://www.bc-llp.com/Civil-Trial-Specialists/

http://www.bc-llp.com/Attorneys/Gregory-G-Brown.shtml

http://www.bcllpblog.com/trial/

http://www.bc-llp.com

Twitter: @OCTrialLaw

714.505.3000

By: Irvine Trial Attorney Gregory G. Brown

The average person enters into many different types of contracts in their lifetime. Whether its signing up for a credit card, buying a car, agreeing to an extended protection plan on a television, or signing an employment agreement, chances are you have no input in the language of the contract.

If, however, you have input in revising, re-wording, changing, or amending a term within the agreement, the contract may be deemed “mutually drafted” by a court in the event the contract is breached. This designation can be significant in a contract dispute.

Ambiguities Construed Against Drafter

The Latin term contra proferentem is a contract principle that provides that an ambiguous or uncertain term in a contract will be construed against the party that caused the uncertainty to exist. Civ. Code § 1654. Ambiguities are contract language that is difficult to comprehend or distinguish. Royal Neckwear Co. v. Century City, Inc., 205 Cal.App.3d 1146, 1153 (1988).

In a practical sense, the person that “caused the uncertainty to exist” is the person that drafted the agreement. Thus, the general rule is that ambiguities in the drafting of contracts are construed against the drafter. Sands v. E.I.C., Inc., 118 Cal.App.3d 231 (1981).

This rule will benefit the average consumer who is handed a “boilerplate” contract and asked to sign it, or they won’t get a credit card. If, however, some revisions are made by both parties, the question of who drafted the contract can become essential to the determination of a contract dispute.

Effect of Contract Deemed “Mutually Drafted”

Where there is a joint drafting of the agreement, or where the terms and conditions of an agreement have been negotiated by both parties, the contract will not be construed against either party. Mitchell v. Exhibition Foods, Inc., 184 Cal.App.3d 1033, 1042 (1986). Upon a determination by a court that the contract is jointly or mutually drafted, deficiencies in the contract cannot be held against either party. Even if a party negotiated a smaller percentage of the contract than the opposing side, a court may find that enough of the contract was revised that the contract will be mutually drafted. In other words, the negotiation need not be equally proportioned for a finding of joint drafting.

Conclusion

In a contract dispute, the party that drafted the agreement may have the language used against them. If there is a finding, however, that both parties had input, that presumption goes away. Thus, it is important to find an experienced contract litigation attorney in your area to guide you through any dispute you may have.

Orange County Business Litigation Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP

Irvine Business Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP

http://www.bc-llp.com/Civil-Trial-Specialists/

http://www.bc-llp.com/Attorneys/Gregory-G-Brown.shtml

http://www.bcllpblog.com/trial/

http://www.bc-llp.com

Twitter: @OCTrialLaw

714.505.3000


Irvine Trial Attorney Gregory G. Brown discusses a quick five-step process on what to do if you are sued.

Irvine Trial Lawyer Gregory G. Brown

Orange County Trial Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP

Irvine Trial Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP

http://www.bc-llp.com/Civil-Trial-Specialists/

http://www.bc-llp.com/Attorneys/Gregory-G-Brown.shtml

http://www.bcllpblog.com/trial/

http://www.bc-llp.com

Twitter: @OCTrialLaw

714.505.3000



A partnership may be formed whether or not the parties intend to form one, and its existence does not depend on a formal written agreement. Once a partnership is formed, then, it is important for you to know what your rights are in relation to the partnership accounts, recordkeeping, and partnership profits and losses.

Capital Contribution

The traditional “first step” in starting a partnership business requires a capital (usually cash) contribution by each of the partners into the partnership account. This contribution need not be equal, and the contribution itself is not necessarily required, as some partners may contribute their labor and skill to the partnership, rather than cash as capital. Regardless of the extent of capital contribution by each partner, the law deems each partner to have a “partner account” that is subject to several rules/limitations.

Partnership Profits and Losses

The initial partnership account is credited with the amount equal to the money and value of property contributed by the partner. As the partnership business progresses, the partner’s share of the partnership profits is added to this account. The division of profits (and losses) is left to the agreement of the parties.

Partnership Reimbursements

Any partner that acts in the “ordinary course of the business of the partnership” by making payments or taking on liabilities is entitled to reimbursement by the partnership. A partner is also entitled to reimbursement for any advance to the partnership beyond the amount of capital the partner agreed to contribute.

Recordkeeping

No partnership agreement can unreasonably restrict a partner’s access to the books or records of the partnership. This right of access provides the partner, its agents, and attorneys an opportunity to inspect and copy these books and records.

Actions for Accounting

In order to enforce your rights under your partnership, a partner may maintain an action of “accounting” against the partnership or another partner. An action for an accounting forces the partners to account to the partnership for any benefit or profits derived from any transaction connected with the formation, conduct or termination of the partnership or from any use of partnership property.

Other than actions dealing with the end of a partnership or the withdrawal of a partnership, partners are given the right to a formal accounting when:

• The right exists under the partnership agreement;

• A partner is excluded from the business or possession of its property by copartners; and/or

• Any other circumstances that render it just and reasonable.

Conclusion

It is important to stay informed about your partnership’s profits, losses, and recordkeeping. Know your rights when a partnership dispute arises.

Irvine Trial Lawyer Gregory G. Brown
Orange County Trial Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP
Irvine Trial Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP
http://www.bc-llp.com/Civil-Trial-Specialists/
http://www.bc-llp.com/Attorneys/Gregory-G-Brown.shtml
http://www.bcllpblog.com/trial/
http://www.bc-llp.com
714.505.3000

The competition takes place on December 1st, 2011 at OCSC – Central Justice Center!

http://www.bc-llp.com/Civil-Trial-Specialists/



Written by: Gregory Garth Brown

Attorney licensed in California

What is Rescission?

When a contract dispute arises, parties often look for ways to rescind the contract.  A rescission is not merely a cancellation of a contract.  Rather, a rescission will put the parties back to the day the contract was signed and the contract itself will be treated as if it never existed.  This determination by a court requires the parties to the contract to return all consideration under the contract that had been received up to the point of the dispute.  There are several different grounds for rescission of a contract in California.

Grounds for Rescission

In California, Civil Code §1689 governs when a contract may be subject to rescission:

Consent

Parties to a contract can agree to rescind an original contract between them without intervention by the Court.  This can occur regardless of the express terms of the agreement.  However, parties must complete the rescission by returning all consideration already given under the original contract.

Mistake

A party may rescind the contract on the basis of a “unilateral mistake”.  This means that one party was mistaken about a material fact under the contract that the other party knew or suspected of and the party used that mistake to their advantage.  However, if the mistaken party did not do their reasonable diligence in the contract, a unilateral mistake is insufficient for rescission.

If both parties are mutually mistaken about a material fact, then a contract can also be rescinded by either party.

Fraud or undue influence

When a party is “induced” into a contract by a misrepresentation of the other party and relies on that misrepresentation, the defrauded party can rescind the contract.

Failure of consideration

A party to a contract may also rescind a contract based on a failure of the other party to provide “consideration” for their agreement. A refusal or failure of a party to perform his part of the contract, or a clear intention to violate it, gives the other party the right to rescind. For example, a car buyer that fails to deliver the purchase price of a car to a seller after driving off with the car has failed to provide the “consideration” for their agreement.  Thus, buyer may rescind the contract and take back the car.

Unlawful contract and public interest

Finally, a contract may be rescinded if it is against the law or if the public interest will be prejudiced by permitting the contract to stand.

Conclusion

Contract disputes can be complex, and each situation is different.  It is important for any consumer or small business owner to have a basic knowledge of their rights and remedies under contract law.  For more complex disputes, you should find an experienced contract litigator in your area.

Irvine Business Lawyer Gregory G. Brown

Orange County Business Litigation Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP

http://www.bc-llp.com/Civil-Trial-Specialists/

http://www.bc-llp.com/Attorneys/Gregory-G-Brown.shtml

http://www.bcllpblog.com/trial/

http://www.bc-llp.com

714.505.3000

Irvine Trial Attorney, Gregory G. Brown

Certified Trial Specialist  – - Brown & Charbonneau, LLP

for more on trial practice, visit http://www.bc-llp.com/Civil-Trial-Specialists/

In good times and in rough times, always remember “The Doer”

“It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”

Theodore Roosevelt

Irvine Trial Lawyer Gregory G. Brown

Orange County Trial Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP

Irvine Trial Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP

http://www.bc-llp.com/Civil-Trial-Specialists/

http://www.bc-llp.com/Attorneys/Gregory-G-Brown.shtml

http://www.bcllpblog.com/trial/

http://www.bc-llp.com

714.505.3000

Visit our website:   Brown & Charbonneau, LLP                                             Gregory Garth Brown

Written by: Gregory Garth Brown

Attorney licensed in California

In contracts law, a party who was not an original party to a contract may still have the right to sue on the contract in certain situations.  This may be the case regardless of whether they were specifically named in the original contract.  This outside party is known as a “third party beneficiary”.

Intended Beneficiaries

In California, the general rule is that a third party may be entitled to damages from the breach of a contract they are not a party to if they can prove the contracting parties intended for the third party to benefit from their contract.  As mentioned above, a third party beneficiary need not be mentioned in the contract if they can show what the contracting parties intended to benefit the third party.  Courts will instruct juries to look at the contract as a whole and the circumstances under which it is made to determine whether a third party is intended to benefit.

For example, if Party A contracts with Party B to deliver a new swimming pool to Party C, then Party C was the intended beneficiary of that contract though he was never a party to the original contract.

Incidental Beneficiaries

Unlike intended beneficiaries, a third party that has a mere “incidental” or remote interest in a contract between other parties will not have an enforceable right to sue upon breach of the agreement.  For example, an insurance policy maintained by a lessor commercial property owner may only incidentally benefit a lessee restaurant owner in the event of an insurance dispute.

Has the right “vested”?

One has a “vested” right when they have a secured right to present or future enjoyment of a particular asset that cannot be taken away by a third party, even if they do not possess it yet.  To determine whether a third party beneficiary right has vested, one must determine if the beneficiary knows of and has detrimentally relied on the rights created; if the beneficiary expressly assented to the contract at the request of one of the parties; or if the beneficiary files a lawsuit to enforce the contract.  Once this right has vested, a party to the contract cannot rescind or modify the contract.

Conclusion

Contract disputes often involve numerous parties with varying degrees of enforceable rights. When negotiating or reviewing an agreement, it is important to expressly state the intentions of the parties on the face of the contract and ascertain whether any third parties may benefit from your agreement.


Gregory G. Brown receives Highest Possible Legal Rating for 2011

Irvine Trial Lawyer Gregory G. Brown

Visit our website for all the details:

Brown & Charbonneau, LLP Irvine Trial Attorneys

The Orange County Trial Lawyers at Brown & Charbonneau, LLP are pleased to announce that litigation attorney Gregory G. Brown has again received the highest possible legal rating of 10.0/10.0 by the nationwide rating professionals at AVVO for the year 2011

Irvine Trial Lawyer Gregory G. Brown

Orange County Trial Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP

Irvine Trial Lawyers Brown & Charbonneau, LLP

http://www.bc-llp.com/Civil-Trial-Specialists/

http://www.bc-llp.com/Attorneys/Gregory-G-Brown.shtml

http://www.bcllpblog.com/trial/

http://www.bc-llp.com

714.505.3000

Next Page »